Active \ Active Site Resiliency Model

HP-UX、Linux、Tru64 UNIX、NonStop、OpenVMS、Windows Server等,数据中心、虚拟化方案等

版主: xyevolve

版面规则
1. 本版是定位于惠普软件系统及解决方案的技术讨论区。
2. 本版鼓励发帖共同讨论技术问题,不鼓励站内信件私下交流,独知知不如众知知。
3. 本版允许转贴或引用他人的作品,但必须声明原作者信息。
4. 本版禁止发表出售、求购、或其他非技术讨论等帖子。
5. 本版禁止灌水,包括但不限于任何与所讨论主题无关的回复,无意义字符,直接复制其他回复等。
6. 本站附件禁止用于商业目的,请在下载后24小时内删除,本站不对其造成的结果负任何责任。
回复
SYSTEM
网站编辑
帖子: 265
注册时间: 2012年 2月 20日 15:45 星期一

Active \ Active Site Resiliency Model

帖子 SYSTEM » 2012年 10月 16日 18:09 星期二

Shine 写了:We have a customer who has two sites:

Site A: 700 users and Site B: 150 users

We had initially recommended Active\Passive Site Resiliency model where we had two mailboxes with one fsw in the primary site and the DR site with one MBX hosting all passive copies.

Customer needs the DR site to be highly available and also requires that the 150 users in site B access their mailboxes on mbx servers in site B itself. In short customer is looking at Active \ Active scenario now.

From what I understand the best way to go about with it to host two Dags with 3 MBX servers each (4 incase of HA). I guess the configuration should look like below:

1) Dag 1 : Two Mbx’s in Site A hosting Active Passive copies , One FSW in Site A and One Mbx in Site B hosting passive copies
2) Dag 2: Two Mbx’s in Site B hosting Active Passive Copies, One FSW in Site B and One Mbx in Site A hosting passive copies.

Please advice if this is the right approach or if there are any other alternatives and best practices.

The only concern is that the number of mailboxes for the configuration is high considering that there are only 850-900 users.

SYSTEM
网站编辑
帖子: 265
注册时间: 2012年 2月 20日 15:45 星期一

Re: Active \ Active Site Resiliency Model

帖子 SYSTEM » 2012年 10月 16日 18:10 星期二

Andreas 写了:in Active/Active scenarios the recommendation is two DAGs as you described. Mainly to avoid failovers because of WAN outage – so active DB at siteB will stay at siteB with two DAGs.

Keep in mind that additional costs for that approach (especially looking at the small number of your mailboxes) is huge – amount of servers, name spaces and so …

FSW comes into play only by odd number of servers.

回复